Wednesday, 3 June 2026

St Gervais Les Bains 2026

PXL_20260525_074255786 Being an accout of my trip down to the Chamonix valley, what I did there with E, and my getting back.

This text is directly cut from my diary, with light edits, and so includes tedia you care nothing for, like my dahlias. But I care. It is currently incomplete, I need to finish formatting, GPS traces, inserting pictures and so on. One day there will be, at the end, a section on practical information, lessons learned, and so on.

Structure: I drove down, starting on Wednesday the 13th of May, arriving on Sunday the 17th; we had an appartment until Saturday the 30th; E flew back, I drove back, returning late on Tuesday the 2nd of June. There are 855 pix of this glorious event, many of them of various cathedrals along the way. Or sub-select: outward, there, return.

You may think that the last two weeks of May are an odd time to go to Chamonix; but it was "carefully" planned so that we could use the hut winter rooms.

Now read on...

Monday 11th May: E off early to London; I am awake, and hear her go off, but decide to lounge in bed. Eve: outing with the men at 5, coxing the ladies at 6:30; I remain dissatisfied with their catches but today that wasn’t their focus. By a spare Petzl from Outside; E can’t find hers, though we’ll probably also borrow D’s. Finally book channel crossing: via tunnel, because more frequent as well as faster. They are every half hour, rather than 1.5+ hours for ferries. Find OAV cards. Plant out some dahlias at the back, having heavily manured the bed.

Tuesday 12th: the eve of departure. I have done “most” of my packing, just that awkward last 10% to go, how hard can that be? The train is 10:46, so to Folkestone 9:46, so leave 7:30 so get up 6:30 I suppose, that should be doable, I was awake before 7 today, since I’m sleeping with the curtains open. The garden is in order, I watered it, it has rained a little, I shall leave a note for M.

Weds 13th: up 6:20 last fiddles (I remembered to put my wedding ring on now I'm not bouldering) b’fast, heating off, off 7:15. 10:15: on Shuttle, whew. Departure is 10:46 (oh, except it isn't we’re off at 10:21) check-in nominally closed 9:46 I was 10 mins late due to traffic around Dartford but no problem. The delay stressed me a bit even though I know I could get the next or one after, since even a cheapo ticket allows +1 hour. All pretty quiet at this season.

Managed to get onto coast road. Stop at Cap Blanc Nez [GPS], preceded by memorial to Hubert Latham, pioneering aviator. Also touching memorial to Kevin the biker. It is very windy. The countryside is lovely: rolling hills, little villages, fields of grain rippling in the wind. The coastal walk is appealing, though the family of four biking was struggling up the hill.

1:30: at Wissant [GPS], sitting in the sun outside a cafe (terrasse des filles) sheltered from the wind with an allongé. Lovely. In the distance giant cargo ships; beyond, the White cliffs. Peace. Inshore, wind surfers and kiters are just visible over the seawall; the sea roars.

I then stay on the coast road for a while before finally admitting it is too slow and accept Gmaps toll alternative. Which is a lot less effort. And so, Rouen. I haven't thought through exactly how to get to my room, or even quite where it is. Park in uground Palais de Justice, will discover cost tomorrow. Walk 5 mins to room, no-one there, contact via Booking, and a somewhat shambling guy turns up, but speaking good Eng, and lets me in (the room was E31, which must represent about the lowest cut-to-the-bone price possible with clean appt and clean sheets). And then a surreal wander through Rouen. Charming place, full of interest, from old stone to ruelles to half timbered houses; all quite alive. Fantastic cathedral frontage (but the beauty is the detail that Monet lost). But it took me ages to find and navigate ped access to parking. Now, cafe, in l’Espiguette. Either the concept of allongé hasn't reached Rouen yet or my pronunciation is worse than I feared.

Thurs 14th: alarm 7:30 (really 6:30…) up just before 8, out :15, to Cath want cafe but; go in, service, listen 20 mins, sitting far back and enjoying the view with hymns. Cafe nearby, then back to room, clear and leave. To Abbatial: front has been scrubbed but rear is lovely esp on a now sunny green morning. Then to cat cafe! Well time for a cafe anyway and cats a bonus. Mlle is so suited as proprietor of same: cute girl in tune with her cats. Good. Then to Cath and admire again. The front is spectacular; multi layered; you have to move to appreciate it a picture doesn't do it. But I take one anyway. Then hailstorm and back to car. Route: follow bends of Seine for a bit for fun, past chalky cliffs.

6 pm: cafe in Chartres [GPS] watching the rain on the porch, and trying not to beat myself up too much about damaging the car. For stupid reasons (Gmaps and my hotel disagreeing about route, the GPS losing lock or me being confused) I failed to think and attempted to drive down a narrow road partly blocked by scaffolding; this did not end well. Circle round again and this time go the right way unconfused; checkin. Room is good as is Hostellerie. But farewell to a quiet afternoon peacefully soaking in the glories of Chartres. I do visit but don't find peace. Instead, a green walk along the river a few kms (that I wanted to do anyway) to Supermarche to try to buy gaffer tape but… it is Ascension Day and the Fr take that seriously. So walk back. A local has juice and cheese so likely that will be supper.

I’ve felt like this when I have done stupid things before. I think realising that helps. I know I will keep going over “but I should have thought; if only I had…” in the night. Ah well. I have tried to sublime it into a sensible resolution: be more cautious: and will try to apply that to this holiday as penance.

Anyway: look round the Cathedral again; the choir screen stonework is its interior glory though some of the glass is decent too. Realise I’m poor at following the life of Christ scenes.

And so back. Shower. Lie on bed and read (Lewis) / phone, and have some bread-n-cheese. This room is functionally no better than last night but much nicer. Party because of the unseen at the moment but present in my mind surroundings.

Friday 15th: up 7 b’fast in sunny room. I actually slept pretty well, just a bit of 5:30 angst. Then discover little terrace overlooking the town. This is a good place to stay.

Go up and look around some more, walk all the way round, admire glass, take more pix even though I did last time… then back to Hostellerie, and drive off to that Supermarche now open and get tape and repair - or rather patch - car. Feel better. Later get reply from CRG recommending body shop, so perhaps there is hope. Feel better. Sit by l’Eure a bit then off to Orleans.

Route is up then flat, wide fields, fairly dull, saved by nice avenues of shade trees.

Orleans: park by river visit Cath [GPS] admire it as esp towers and inside the somewhat weird modern glass. Sit outside cafe and gaze, finally realising time is flowing.

But meh: go to Meung anyway, have a cafe near church and chateau, then walk to river [GPS] and find statue to Jehan.

Finally to Blois [GPS], the remembered old bridge over the wide river. To Best Western Chateau, decent, nice room in the eves. Catch up phone and shower while it rains then walk around to river and back, I am jealous of their orange iris in formal garden. Buy more goat’s cheese and that with y’days bread is supper. Fuel: half tank and 450 miles.

Sat 16th: I am realising that my lack of driving may catch up on me. So alarm 6:45 allowing one snooze then b’fast 7 and after 3x coffee off 8. Early mist gone farewell nice Blois. Along Loire lovely (see a pine marten cross road I’m pretty sure) only regret is no time to keep stopping; come back on bike sometime? Saumur 10:30 thriving huge “castley” chateau; Blindés is not as I thought chief attraction. Spend about 2:30 there, not rushed, pic of most of the early stuff. Glad I went shame it is so far “over” it is 5h to Autun.

2:50: break in Loché-s-Indrois by little weir. Finish cheese bread still going.

3:30: passing through Levroux and my eye is caught; there's a cute maison du Bois; and a sturdy respectable church.

4:40: Chateauneuf-s-Cher. Pretty little rivers, tiny little cafe that looks shut but isn't; follow two locals in. Cafe avec biscuit €1.30: is this a charity? Book hotel (appt) Autun, exchange messages E.

7:30: Autun [GPS]. More narrow streets! But no scaffolding. My appt is indeed what it says: a full appt, including sitting room and kitchen and study, all scrupulously clean with high ceilings. This is an old place, built as cloister, currently mostly assisted living but presumably renting out a few spare rooms. Walk up to Cath which says it opens late Sunday I hope not. Walk around town and look over countryside slowly.

Sunday 17th: up 7. The day is grey the birds sing. B’fast: quite small but what I want. So far I am alone. Slowly sun emerges. There is a lovely winding multi-level garden off the terrace that I explore. Quiet, beautiful. The appt and the whole building is uplifting. And to think, I almost wimped out and booked an Ibis, a reminder to me that risk does have rewards, too. This could be a Romance garden. Visit Cath (sign says no visit Sunday morning but Frog slips in so I do), quietly, though Mme and her infant aren't. But capital is… in the treasury? Have fun looking. Off. Refill by lac: was 3/16 left, 775 miles. +56L.

1:20: Bourg [GPS]. Disappointing I say; perhaps Sunday is not it's busiest. But children from Cath in finest Sunday suit is good to see. The cafe I have found is heavily immigrant, by which I suppose I mean darkish skin and heavy beards. But all happy. Cath unexciting but get p’card for Ma. Gmaps is offering me 1:30 off for tolls so I think I will take it. Just when I write a place off: gorgeous tiny courtyard with tree in sun.

4: StG. Pickup keys. 970 miles. Cafe. M video calls, she's back home. To appt via Supermarket, some confusion but make it, work barrier, find right building and floor… and I’m in. Hurrah. Not large but fine and two bedrooms and balcony with lovely mountain views, currently snowy. We are, I realise, in St G not le Fayet St G. I wonder which I prefer? Pick up E from Sallanches 20 mins away. Sit, make coffee, then walk 5 mins to town and eat at the second place we find, Lulu’s. Classy food, E has risotto I have buratta. And so home, more balcony and bed.

Monday 18th: a fairly quiet day. Up 7 b’fast coffee E up 8. 9 ish to Chamonix - about 25 mins - park underground and walk into town. We don't have much to do: look around shops; cafe at the elegant Josephine; inquire of the Maison du Montage. They aren't encouraging… new snow, perhaps we should take snowshoes? Hmm I think not. Well we we shall see. Up to le Tour to recce [GPS]: there is a large empty car park and a faint track up and as expected a closed cable car. Drive home, on and off rain continues. To supermarket for… porridge, cereal bars and stuff, after E carefully makes a list [GPS]. Pack, slowly, I winnow gear down. E cooks the fresh pasta and some white asparagus which needs peeling.

Tuesday 19th: 8:50 at le Tour carpark; we are the only car (for 2019, see France 2019: Albert Premier (Aiguille du Tour; Tete Blanche, Petite Fourche)). Bright sunny day, time to trog up for four hours or so [GPS]. And off we go. We feel slow but actually managed 300m/h until the snow at 2100m then slow down; 5h to the hut, stepping up through deep snow is hard work; we alternate trail breaking. As we arrive the cloud comes in somewhat and it snows. The winter hut is a salle downstairs, and dortoirs upstairs. Cold, so we get the wood fire going and melt water. Slowly, we can no longer see our breath. Late lunch: E cooks up some pasta that has been left using gas someone left. 4:30: E off for a nap while I manage the fire and water. Afternoon: read, look out. Dinner: E suggests bread and cheese, which sort-of should have been lunch but we wanted something warm then. And saussison. I go to bed just before 8, E later. It is colder upstairs but we have s’bags (because woman in Maison du Montage thought wrongly there might not be blankets; my new s2s, and E has my Purple rab) and blankets. Sleep well.

Wednesday 20th: up 6 start fire make porridge and tea. Outside it is snowing, which then stops, but we're in cloud. Hmm. We talk: maybe we'll make a tentative, and see how it goes, but we're expecting failure. 8: still cloudy. I am reading A Passage To India; E, Lolly Willows. 9: somewhat better, head off [GPS]. It is hard going in soft snow but at least we get the initial path from the hut right, aided by a few cairns. Wx gradually clears to sun, as it is supposed to. Snow going remains difficult and we are slow. Get to top of Signal Reilly and decide on the Col Pissoir branch, I have failed to read the other Rock fax routes properly. We continue to 50m of the col but progress becomes harder and we're 5h in. Ah well: retreat by mutual agreement. Wx is closing in a bit too. Down, strangely enough, is much easier and we do several hours ascent in 20 mins. And so back, around 2. To our astonishment the winter hut is full! Well, no free tables. There are some army folk; and some others with raquettes or skis. We weren't sure about staying the night or descending but now our private paradise is invaded, we’ll descend. Start down 3 [GPS], fighting snow even on desc, and get down in just over 2h, navigating the somewhat icky scrambling sections. Car, and head off home for welcome yoghurt and shower. Sun pours in. Soir: to town for crepes but it is shut today, so pizza. Which is too big but otherwise good.

Thursday 21st: up 8; E soon after. Realise my skylight makes the day look grey from my bed: actually it's bright sun and blue skies. And in a fit of conversation, say that to E instead of just thinking it. Perhaps I should do that more. Sadly balcony doesn't get sun in the morning; E bravely sits out anyway. After, stroll to town. The fancy cafe doesn't have outside tables so pick the one opposite, by the church. Realise StG is rather lovely to just be in. Two coffees a juice and we alternate looking around the church (typical Romanesque onion dome; i.e. not ornamented except the altar) then it is getting on for noon and Mme has set all the tables for lunch and starts clearing our empties; we can take a hint and pay. Get bread and then nice cheese from cheese man in marché and back for lunch. Pm: 2: off to Les Galliands for sport and have a nice time doing 3 easy pieces [GPS]. Back. E goes to shop, I shower. E gets some biere (rouge) on request. Sadly - and yet a quiet evening in will be pleasant - the travelling Lyon opera is booked out; but we were prepared to do our cultural duty.

Friday 22nd: up 7:45. We had kinda intended to leave at 9 for Les G again, but I am feeling lazy and E isn't otherwise so instead we’ll wash clothes and head off to boulder at Les Bossons around 10:30 [GPS]. Plan for tomorrow is Montenvers train and Couvercle, which should be open. E is still feeling her calves and me my quads; perhaps I like her should have used a second stick on descent. Do the Bossons boulders: quiet and peaceful in the woods also cool and shaded. We find the boulders and do some (easy) climbs but as we go on our identification becomes less clear. We get up to boulder 10. Most of the markings have weathered off; a few traces remain. Then to Chamonix to see Montenvers terminal, it is shut but promises to be open tomorrow. Walk to town and have nice proper lunch in the Isabella: entree and salmon for me; Magret de canard for E. And then a coffee; finishing after three. Thence to le Fayet thermes crags, rather a nice environment [GPS]; some old world elegance remains. Sit in shade for a bit as the sun is hot; then do the shaded 4c at the R of the RHS crag, and the somewhat less shaded 4a/5a at the R of the LHS. Which also turns out to be more than 30m so you do need to split the pitch. And ab off from the top. But we manage. Back 6:30 I go post p’card to Ma and buy bread. Video call M. Dinner is soup and bread and cheese. Book Cosmiques for Sunday - Saturday is full - and Couvercle for Wednesday and Thursday - Saturday is also full. Set alarm for 1:30 am to watch Starship flight 12: woo!

Saturday 23rd: up earlier so we can get to start of via ferrata by 9, via the cute auto Ascenseur [GPS]. There is a largeish group about to start, so we gear up, then some of them go wobbly so we go ahead. After a first easy bridge section we let two lean mean speedy types through and are then relaxed. It swiftly gets decently difficult: there are lots of rungs but there are overhanging sections. We take about 45 mins for S1 then have a rest, and look out of the passarelle. It's a lovely green gorge with plunging cataract, we rest our arms, the other group go through. And then we do the next section, which is more strenuous and leave at echappoir #2 with our arms wringing. Fun! Walk up to top; I straight to town for cafe and E via shower; sit by church again. Then move over rue to Patisserie Fattier for fruit tarts. And then a peaceful afternoon mostly at home though we do venture out to look at the local gear shop - well supplied - and buy bread cheese etc for tomorrow. Oh, and remember to book telepherique.

Sunday 24th: up 6:30 out 7:30 Cham 8 parking Grepon (for 2019, see France 2019: Cosmiques). There are cabins going already - we thought 8:30 was the earliest but no - so to nearby cafe. To reassure, there's a departure board of cabins, they are loading #17 now and we are #20. Cool, blue skies. Slightly rushed departure from cafe when #20 is signed but get on in plenty of time. Up, dramatically to Plan d’Aiguille then even more dramatically to the top [GPS]. Pause on bridge to admire views: it is gorgeous in this fine wx. Gear up there: warmer than the ice tunnel. Then to exit, crampons+rope, and out. There's a lot of people but we're at the tail of the rush. People heading up Trois Monts.There's a good trace but we - esp E - go slowly and cautiously. And so to col, easily from there, admiring views and lots of parties on the rock. And skiers, and parapents. To hut, maybe less than an hour, and snow slope up easy. Inside, too early to register says Mme so blister plaster my blister, can up, little food, loo, dump excess kit and off 11:20 for the Torino hut [GPS].

We have a good trip but it is longer than I carelessly expected: 3h, not “about 2h”. That means we can't lounge around too long because we need to be back for dinner at 6:30. Lots of views of people climbing the rock routes as we pass. Torino remains like the bar in an Italian village. And so head back, making it just in time, at least formally, though as we're at the back of the service queue we could have been later… Talk with Fr in Eng, perhaps more E than me. Dinner extends to 8:30 and we're both pretty tired so to bed after, with a brief time out on the terrasse but it's cold out. E’s eyes are troubling her: they hurt, and they seem to have more red capillaries on the outside than is right. Make her “side pieces” for her sunglasses like mine have. Discuss that her glasses may not be super-uv-protecting.

Monday 25th: E has booked us 7 am b’fast with the intent of us getting off by 8. We make 8:10. She has decided she is good for Cosmiques which is good; it would have been disappointing not; though I am nervous of the route finding mostly. She doesn't want much b’fast though: possibly feeling the altitude. As it turns out, the route is fine [GPS]. And we have several parties around to keep us on track; and indeed there are footsteps since it is still quite snowy. First descend; then up to old obs where we gear up and take in coils to about 20m. Then there's a snow slope then more, then a diagonal abs for ~20m, then nominally two more 20 m but actually with a 60m rope we run them together. At that point we're “quite close”: I can see the Midi terrasse and it's not far off. But we have the notorious “wall with front point holes” to do, which is fun, but well within me; we're not pitching any of this. Then we’re at the famous chimney, I think, but everyone is going round the N side (to the L) so we do too and it's fine. And a bit more and we’re up the ladder onto the terrasse. 3:30 a good time for us. Bravo from some tourists is pleasing. Dekit, relax, look round, gaze up the Tacul face in awe at the little dots heading up. And so to cafe, for an hour or so, and then descend and home and showers and more rest. Soir: out for citron pressé and boules de glace, buy some juice, and to Brasserie for salmon ceviche, and tartiflette for me.

Tuesday 26th: up late around 9 and E a little later; quiet morning reading+phone. Outside they are strimming the grass and replacing boring modern street lights with retro looking ones. Lunchtime in town for cafe [GPS], and watch municipal folk doing stuff to flower beds in the hot sun. Buy food, back for lunch, E cooks sphag and we have cheese; relax pm until 5; take escalator down (realise it is water powered) to practice abbing-with-prussic [GPS], and also prussicing (hard, and would need lots of practice, and I don't want to knock my nice slings about). Back, video call with M. Quiet evening; pack. Book nice villa appt Autun for Sunday night, and le Shuttle for Tuesday night.

Wednesday 27th: slept with window open o’night good. Up 6:30 b’fast with E on balcony. Another nice day predicted to continue. Off 7:30 to Cham free parking just by Montenvers station (for 2019, see France 2019: Couvercle and Pointe Isabella). Get tickets - Mme informs us it is view only, the grotto de glace is fermé, and we solemnly agree - I go get some more notes, and then we're off! Fairly quick, 20 mins. E has carelessly forgotten her water bottle so buys 500ml for an outrageous €4, meh. And we're off [GPS]. There is of course a trail of people. The poor old glacier continues to retreat, we pass the 1820 level sign, then the 2018, then 2020 (we were here in 2019) and still down. We can get down via grot-d-g steps not nasty moraine. And then… well, off we go, somewhat unclear, follow our noses and people and hope. The glacier is cut by largeish streams and one has to get on the right side of them. Some parties have stopped to play at crampons; we put ours on and pass a slightly dodgy section above a rushy river. At about 2h we’ve got high enough, decrampon, and turn up the moraine to the ladders. 3h start ladders, which are long but less scary this time; we take them slowly. After that, there are two path junctions to Charpoa, then around to the apparently impregnable rock face split by a giant crack and more ladders, and up, and then at last we can see the hut, just a traverse away. 5:48, was 6h last time. Sign in, sit down, notice hut has been renovated. Go in swimming pool! Have cafe/hot choc, and rhubarb tart, then outside for bread+cheese. It is almost warm: there are some nuages. 5:30: go recce start for tomorrow [GPS]. And: it is further down and back than you expect. But there's a cairn and yellow pole trail start, and signs warning re Charpoa path demontage. Decent veg dinner and soon after to bed.

Thurs 28th: b’fast 4:30 as compromise between 4 and 5; off 5:30 when light enough not to need head torches. Down as recce, then via rope onto snow and so on up [GPS]. Behind Mont B goes rosy then comes into sun, but happily we’re still in shadow. There are two skiers ahead of us, and some others of unknown purpose, but we're not obviously dropping back. On! Over some icky snow slopes of ~6’ snow on top of smooth rock. Fine now but feel avalanche-y later. Snow now is hard: crampons bite but don't sink in. After quite some time to base of real route, the snow slope to crest. Up this, and then start feeling it is all a bit steep, even me, but esp E. Now in sun. Gear in the “scrambling” section but more steep snow and call a halt at 3550. Ah well. This turns out to be wise as our descent is slow: I lower E down the steep sections taking advantage of tat, but there's a lot. But eventually we get back to the crest, and by then snow has softened and we get back onto safer ground. It is now simply a matter of getting down - oh, and by now the skiers, having submitted, have whizzed off for their lovely descent - and we set off into softening snow, and slowed by taking a detour to avoid the slabs. Get quite weary and dry, but eventually back to hut at 5, whew. Pool again, having washed feet. Sit. Rest. Dinner again good: egg, rice, spinach; bed soon after, I am v tired.

Friday 29th: leisurely b’fast at 7, then sit outside admiring the glorious view: up to Pt Isa, across to Dent du Geant, over Mer to the basin we walked over, up to Mt Blanc. After the slightly scary descent y’day I am counting the things to get down before we're safe: mostly the ladders. E drags us off 8:30, since we want to avoid the sun [GPS]. We get to the top of the ladders before leaving the shade, and the ladders themselves surprisingly quick: 17 mins, but it's a loong way. Then the rope down dust, then down the icky soily moraine, then pick our way over the rocky moraine, to the thin central strip of ice. That's easy walking but doesn't last long; above Ecole de Glace, more mank, cross the river, more easy ice, more moraine and then finally onto the stairs, then ladders, then path, then Montenvers, sit, relax. Just over 5h: it really is a long way to or from Couvercle. E swears never to go again; I don't. Sit over cafe, then train and we’re in Cham at 3.

Saturday 30th: up 6 to take E to airport. She has an implausible amount of carry on luggage but says it usually works. My tonsils, that got very dry towards the end of Pt Isa day, are made incautious swallowing unpleasant, are still slightly sore. It's cool out on the balcony for our last b’fast together. Drive fine, kiss-n-drop nearly fine except for mysteriously absent place to stop; terror on way back as no internet (GiffGaff in Swiss) forces me to use carnav, and it wants to go through Geneva. But it is fine. Nearly stop but decide not. Back, wander to town for long leisurely coffees but read mail: ah: checkout is today not tomorrow. Oops. Make that a brief but not rushed cafe. Back, pack, clean, brief sit on balcon to relax, last shower to wash off sweat, up town to drop keys and we're done about 11:30. Decide I still want Annecy waterfront, but will settle for soir not morn, so aim to get there around… 6? Will go via Megeve. But first, to Les Contamines Montjoie, where M and I camped on TMB… 39 years ago [GPS]. Cafe. Then a little further to the roadhead [GPS]. There are many paths and possibilities and I feel guilty for ignoring them until I recall my left heel, which needs rest.

So start the long journey back (1300 miles, tank 7/16_. Through Megeve, to Lac d’Annecy SW end, where the folks bathed and sunbathe and sail. Peaceful lap of waves, even with a distant powerboat. Sit behind closed hotel and read for a bit and polish off old food. Then to “proper” bit for cafe, then sit, and little swim [GPS]. Lovely! Not cold. Distant limestone cliffs over the lac. On, some traffic delays, don't stop Annecy - well I’ve had my lake - through nice hills to Nantua where I wished I'd stopped last year and now can, at the head of the lac. Still evening with sun down lake, beautiful. Stroll [GPS]. Monument to deportation.

Sun 31st: the last of May. B’fast 7 overlooking lac. L’Embarcadere is clean fresh and modern, and good for an o’night stay but is also an image of anomie. Walk. Nantua lakefront is lovely, the town behind fading. Drive a little, to Ain, and take side road down to river above which towers the bridge I crossed on; below is another world. Drive along slowly. Sparse: fisher folk, two scullers, a jogger and dog. Park in little field; people have been camping; drone. Blue skies are over. Back en route. Stop Ceyzeriat for cafe; seems alive; what once was. Listened to S+G “America”, a good melancholy road song; the GL “If you could read my mind” and wallow in emotion. But it's not like that. Chalon unsympa [GPS]. Canal du Centre diversion at Ecuisses [GPS]. To Autun about 3, to Cath, look, to tresor, find the glorious Magi stone, and more [GPS]. To Villas Medicci, room 208, sadly not as wonderful as ?107? was. But, fine. Make coffee. Go sit in garden. Heat is gone, breeze is balmy, bees are loud.

Monday 1st June: up for b’fast 7 but no one there; sit in courtyard by fountain and read for a bit. Same simple as before (cafe, juice, 2 rolls, one croissant, butter, honey) which is all I need. After, clear room and sit in garden. 10:30: Canal du Nivernais. Lovely, but the bar by the bridge is shut. A route to cycle. Fuel Nevers: was at ⅛. 1577 miles. Nevers is distinctly sympa to my tastes. I enjoy strolling by the river and up into town and around the Cath, and am not even put out when I find it closed, firstly for lunch, and secondly 1-3 Juin for travaux [GPS]. To the main square for cafe. EDF nuke is steaming impressively. To Briare: wonderful mosaic’d church. Then back to pont canal, where I get a San Pell limonade. Then walk over it [GPS]. Wow! A km long. V impressive. And there's a lovely little gite, once the eclusier’s cottage. But, it is early. Drone.

Then where? Not sure but Dreux is in the right direction, and may be by the Loire. Head off, bravely passing Orleans, but seeing a Nook. End up passing Chartres too, perhaps for the best though it is nice, and managed en car to find Dreux interesting, so we'll go, to a cheapo B+B hotel. So that's 2:30 solid driving, first for a while. Dreux does turn out to be ok, not spectacular, but ok, even if the Royal Chapel is shut le soir and, you guessed, le Mardi. Never mind; eat dinner (baguette and hummus and juice from supermarche) on wall overlooking town [GPS]. Then check on car (ok, free 7pm to 9am) and to le Beffroi etc. Drone, as an experiment.

Tuesday 2nd: last day dawn's rain: I haven't seen that for some time. B’fast early. Off in rain that turns torrential along the Eure, nice. Evreux. Cath: grey and gloomy and obsessed with numbering it's doors. Old glass. So many symbols that must have meaning once. Has a somewhat Ely-like central octagon lantern, but in stone. Rouen: Cath, again. Still good. Cat cafe: also still good [GPS]. 3h to Calais, I need to be there for 7. To le Treport plage. It's rather Gt Yarmouth but hilly - white cliffs, there's a funicular - sunny, windy and stony. Cafe chez Yunus [GPS]. To Wissant which is nicer. But also windy. Big jumps from kite surfers. Cafe. And then… at last… time for the tunnel via one last bit of coast. Hello aviator statue, sweeping poppy lined roads, distant sea. Fr passport fine; UK is dreadfully slow. But my early train is delayed so it doesn't matter. Home, 10. Navigate new gate. Fuel: ½; total miles for trip 2100.

Notes

Lessons learnt

* in the early season, be prepared to have and use raquettes. There appear to be a variety of these.

* there can be a lot of snow in the last two weeks of May.

Wednesday, 13 May 2026

Book review: Once Upon a Time in the North

PXL_20260513_183350787 By Philip "Dark" Pullman. Given to me, or acquired by me, at Mother's at Christmas. Lightweight, but fun. An offshoot, providing Lee Scoresby and Iorek Byrnison's backstory. Finished in Rouen.

Lee is the laconic hero, better with guns and thinking than you'd guess from his exterior. Iorek and he do a thing people never do in books but it is excellent: IB says his name, and LS subtly mispronounces it, as you'd expect, instead of just getting an unfamiliar name right.

I could do without the capitalism-is-evil schtick, but then again PS's theology in HDMI was pretty ropey if you looked closely, which you weren't supposed to.

Getting a ton of polar bear into a balloon seems implausible.

Tuesday, 12 May 2026

Book review: The Grain Kings

PXL_20260512_100031709 Another one from childhood, along with Pavane. I still remember the cover. I also recall not really understanding it as a child - well, a teenager - and I don't really think I understand it now, even with the weight of experience heavy on my shoulders.

This review gives it three stars, and provides a handy summary of the stories, together with reactions to them that I largely agree with. Or this one.

Unlike Pavane, there's no linking these stories together, and that is a lack. Perhaps they are better regarded as pictures; perhaps this one star review that concludes "I really didn't enjoy reading this, but it has stayed with me and I think back on the stories a lot. I am enjoying thinking back on them far more than I enjoyed them at the time" is the best.

Friday, 24 April 2026

Book review: Perspectives

PXL_20260424_192221932I enjoyed this; I would consider it as lightweight easy-reading fluff, slightly redeemed by name-dropping Italian painters in a way that made me more interested in seeing their works. Or as the first of the blurbs on the cover truthfully says, "a racy and enjoyable detective story". But I wouldn't call it "funny".

It is written as a succession of letters amongst the various persona; this keeps things moving, and breaks things up into easy-to-read chunks; and indeed it is very readable. But after a while it becomes a little wearing; one longs for some variety.

It looks like from this that the Pontormo frescos, and their controversial nature, were a real thing. But I'm not sure that is terribly important. It was fun reading, but I realise that it hasn't really helped my understanding of any of the painting, or of the history, since I don't know which bits are faked and which not.

Now for the downsides. On the surface, the language is relentlessly modern, which detracts from any immersion into the world; and all the characters write in much the same voice; compare to say Patrick O'Brien who provides convincing conversations. This surface of language extends to ideas; for example Our Investigator starts talking about means, motive and opportunity as though it were an Agatha Chistie.

The Wild Ride of Michelangelo is not believeable; neither that an old man could do such a thing, nor that he would find his long-disused secret entrance, nor that he could do all this unobserved. Using post-horses at the very least would have left a trail of notice in his wake. Nor do I believe that someone like him would have shaken off all his servants. Come to that, that he was the killer isn't very believable either. So rather than - as Our Ag so often manages - to have the final unmasking be a satisfying conclusion, it is more like "ho hum, I suppose the book is over then, that will have to do as an ending". Also disappointing is the Klew of the Repainted Fresco. I kinda wanted it to be someone hiding something in the wall, or something of that nature. It was distinctly unsubtle how often the book hammered home that the repainting needed to be explained. OTOH, killing with a chisel is odd - especially in a city where every gentleman and many others carry daggers - so the complete lack of interest in "why use that as a murder weapon" grates. Of course the answer is that Our Author knows it isn't an interesting clue, but Our Investigators shouldn't know it.

Also... on reflection, this is a poor detective story for the additional reason that instead of a number of interesting possible candidates, with clues to eliminate them, we're really presented with no plausible candidates (the rebellious apprentices quickly fizzle out).

The sub-plot - which isn't really sub; it is more a co-plot - about the Naughty Picture is, at the end, seen to be entirely separable from the main plot; and this I think is a weakness; in a better book they would have been inseparably connected in some way. And in the end, the title is irrelevant too. It is a word related to painting, yes. And a sequence of letters gives us different perspectives, yes. But I expected more; and the out-of-place interpolations about perspective in the book make it feel like the author realised this too and needed to stuff something in.

And lastly: the wrapper for all this is Our Author finding a collection of old letters; but it seems entirely implausible that all the letters described would end up in one collection.

Note: Mfd reviewed this too, as a .doc. It is interesting to compare our two; he is more positive.

Monday, 20 April 2026

Book review: Against Gravity

PXL_20260420_110253497 Gazza Gibbo again, and yes I know I should have known better. I lasted for 250 pages, about half way through, before giving up. Before I actually say anything about the book, here is a curiously apposite quote from Lewis, in the Allegory of Love:

The De Nuptiis, as is well known, became a text-book in the Middle Ages. Its encyclopaedic character made it invaluable for men who aimed at a universality in knowledge without being able, or perhaps willing, to return to the higher authorities. The fantastical 'babu' ornaments of the style were admired. The mixture of fable with grammatical or scientific doctrine was a damnosa hereditas which it bequeathed to the following centuries; Martianus, I take it, must bear the chief responsibility for Hawes' Tower of Doctrine and Spenser's House of Alma. He established a disastrous precedent for endlessness and form-lessness in literary work. Yet I cannot persuade myself that the Middle Ages were entirely unhappy in their choice of a master. Martianus may have been a bad fairy; but I think he had the fairy blood in him. His building is a palace without design; the passages are tortuous, the rooms disfigured with senseless gilding, ill-ventilated, and horribly crowded with knick-knacks. But the knick-knacks are very curious, very strange; and who will say at what point strangeness begins to turn into beauty? I must confess, too, that I am sufficiently of the author's kidney to enjoy the faint smell of the secular dust that lies upon them. At every moment we are reminded of something in the far past or something still to come. What is at hand may be dull; but we never lose faith in the richness of the collection as a whole. Anything may come next. We are 'pleased, like travellers, with seeing more', and we are not always disappointed. Among all these figurative woods and streams, these wheeling poles and pedantic rituals, these solemn processions and councils of the gods-gods that seem no bigger than marionettes, but stiff with gold and carved with Chinese curiosity-among all these, some at any rate suffer us to forget their doctrinal purpose, and breathe the air of wonderland.

Against Gravity is a bit like that, but without the touch of faerie or curiosity.

I gave it two stars on Goodreads, in a generous mood, perhaps for old times sake.

We meet Our Hero in Edinburgh, a refugee from a collapsed America, in a noire-ish atmosphere so typical of cyberpunkiness. He has perhaps-out-of-control enhancements growing within his body that have killed some of his friends, in a manner that will surprise or interest no-one. These were acquired during a formative period in some implausible USAnian prison complex in Venezuela of which we get flashbacks; meanwhile up in the sky is a cylindrical habitat which has apparently been taken over by nano-super-intelligences intent on building a wormhole to the Omega Point in the far future. Various characters are interested in Our Hero, who may or may not be hallucinating some of them; and of course there's a giant evil megacorp, whose boss is like so mega-smart he got the Nobel Prize at age 21, FFS, that's less plausible than a wormhole to the future.

Various "adventures" happen but don't greatly advance the plot, and I don't buy scifi to read about people having fights in hotel rooms and falling from the windows, yawn. I think that if there's a story in there it badly needed excavation from the heap of refuse that had fallen onto it, to reveal the bones, if they exist.


Wednesday, 8 April 2026

100 Must-Read Science Fiction Novels

PXL_20260406_104857964 I stumbed across the 100 Must-Read Science Fiction Novels (arch) and thought it would be fun to se how I compare. My own list is here. Links are to any that I've reviewed, which number... 17. Crass omissions from their list: Hobbit, LoTR, Crowley: the Deep, Engine Summer, Beasts; Icehenge; White Queen; Jack Vance; Aldiss, and more.

1. Dune by Frank Herbert

2. Foundation by Isaac Asimov

3. Frankenstein by Mary Shelley - only technically scifi

4. 1984 by George Orwell - ditto

5. War of the Worlds by H.G. Wells - way too high

6. Brave New World by Aldous Huxley - read as a teenager

7. Neuromancer by William Gibson

8. The Left Hand of Darkness by Ursula K. Le Guin - read years ago; I haven't felt the urge to re-read it; perhaps I should; but Earthsea is her best

9. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? by Philip K. Dick - again, read years ago

10. The Martian Chronicles by Ray Bradbury - and again; elegaic, but I dount they rank this high

11. The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood - never read

12. Hyperion by Dan Simmons - quite enjoyed this but this is too high

13. Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson - decent

14. The Three-Body Problem by Liu Cixin - tosh

15. The Long Way to a Small, Angry Planet by Becky Chambers - never read

16. Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut - years ago, seems high though

17. Kindred by Octavia E. Butler - never read

18. 2001: A Space Odyssey by Arthur C. Clarke - its OK

19. A Canticle for Leibowitz by Walter M. Miller Jr. - decent

20. I, Robot by Isaac Asimov - too high

21. Contact by Carl Sagan - never read

22. Journey to the Centre of the Earth by H.G. Wells - I think I read this as a teenager; I think it is likely tosh but don't really remember

23. Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes - I think I read this as a short story or novella

24. The Fall of Hyperion by Dan Simmons - can't remember

25. The Dispossessed by Ursula K. Le Guin - again, this is the wrong one. Her politics isn't really great; her adventures were better

26. Annihilation by Jeff VanderMeer - never read

27. World War Z by Max Brooks - never read

28. Perdido Street Station by China Miéville - never read

29. Starship Troopers by Robert A. Heinlein - should be higher

30. Solaris by Stanisław Lem - read as a teenager, I recall this as boring and pointless

31. Children of Time by Adrian Tchaikovsky - never read

32. The Moon is a Harsh Mistress by Robert A. Heinlein - I'd put this higher

33. The Forever War by Joe Haldeman - and this

34. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams - not really scifi

35. Ringworld by Larry Niven - terrible

36. Binti by Nnedi Okorafor - never read

37. Blindsight by Peter Watts - meh

38. The Time Machine by H.G. Wells - I recall the film

39. Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury - as-a-teenager; decent

40. Anathem by Neal Stephenson - too low

41. Old Man’s War by John Scalzi - never read

42. The Power by Naomi Alderman - never read

43. City by Clifford D. Simak - never read

44. The Andromeda Strain by Michael Crichton - as-a-teenager; can't recall

45. Shards of Honour by Lois McMaster Bujold - never read

46. Gateway by Frederik Pohl - as-a-teenager; decent

47. The Road by Cormac McCarthy - never read

48. Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood - never read

49. Embassytown by China Miéville - I think I read this after M gave it to me for Christmas years back. It was OK, but didn't inspire me to read others-by

50. Parable of the Sower by Octavia E. Butler - never read

51. The Man in the High Castle by Philip K. Dick - as-a-teenager; decent, should be higher

52. Altered Carbon by Richard K. Morgan - read, quite liked; see-also Broken Angels

53. Spin by Robert Charles Wilson - never read

54. The Calculating Stars by Mary Robinette Kowal - never read

55. Revelation Space by Alastair Reynolds - yup, liked this

56. The Book of the New Sun by Gene Wolfe - should be much higher

57. Light by M. John Harrison - no

58. Wool by Hugh Howey - never read

59. Ancillary Justice by Ann Leckie - higher

60. The Diamond Age by Neal Stephenson - decent

61. Seveneves by Neal Stephenson - terrible; DNF

62. Lucifer’s Hammer by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle - never read

63. Red Rising by Pierce Brown - never read

64. The Sparrow by Mary Doria Russell - never read

65. Under the Skin by Michel Faber - never read

66. A Fire Upon the Deep by Vernor Vinge - higher

67. Morning Star by Pierce Brown - never read

68. The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins - I think I read 1 and 2 when D did, on the holiday to Spain

69. Battle Royale by Koushun Takami - never read

70. Sea of Rust by C. Robert Cargill - never read

71. The Chrysalids by John Wyndham - read-as-a-teenager; can't recall

72. Earth Abides by George R. Stewart - read years ago, not that wonderful

73. Metro 2033 by Dmitry Glukhovsky - never read

74. The First Fifteen Lives of Harry August by Claire North - never read

75. Station Eleven by Emily St. John Mandel - never read

76. Cloud Atlas by David Mitchell - never read

77. Eon by Greg Bear - meh

78. Diaspora by Greg Egan - never read

79. The Postman by David Brin - never read

80. We by Yevgeny Zamyatin - never read

81. The Windup Girl by Paolo Bacigalupi - quite liked

82. The Drowned World by J.G. Ballard - read-as-a-teenager; should read again I think

83. The Kraken Wakes by John Wyndham - ditto

84. Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro - never read

85. Roadside Picnic by Arkady and Boris Strugatsky - meh

86. The Night Side of the Sun by David Wingrove - never read

87. Pavane by Keith Roberts - higher

88. The Water Knife by Paolo Bacigalupi - never read

89. The Space Between Worlds by Micaiah Johnson - never read

90. To Say Nothing of the Dog by Connie Willis - never read

91. Ender’s Game by Orson Scott Card

92. A Scanner Darkly by Philip K. Dick - read-as-a-teenager; can't recall

93. Dark Matter by Blake Crouch - never read

94. Leviathan Wakes by James S.A. Corey - kinda generic potboilerish, if I recall correctly

95. The Library at Mount Char by Scott Hawkins - never read

96. Recursion by Blake Crouch - never read

97. The Rapture of the Nerds by Cory Doctorow and Charles Stross - never read

98. The 5th Wave by Rick Yancey - never read

99. Life as We Knew It by Susan Beth Pfeffer - never read

100. The Broken Earth Trilogy by N.K. Jemisin - never read

Book review: Travel Light

PXL_20260408_081558768 By Naomi Mitchison. We have owned this - or perhaps M has owned this - for time out of mind; and it is possible I've read it before; it is eerily familiar in parts. It is... whimsy; a jeu d'esprit; or so I say. Perhaps I missed anything deeper.

Halla as a baby is rescued from the court by her nurse-turned-bear, stays with the bears for a while, then as winter and hibernation approaches is transferred to the dragons, with whom she grows up. Slowly - later on, towards the end, it is revealed that the stoary has taken many generations and perhaps hundreds of years - men grow stronger and dragons more precarious; her protector is killed, and following a chat with the All-Father she heads off towards Midgard-aka-Byzantium, travelling light, forsaking the golden ornaments that her dragon-self loves. In Byzantium her ability to talk to animals allows her to predict the chariot races, earning money for her friends and an audience with the Emperor, and eventually the replacement of an Evil Governor that her friends had come to petition for. Returning, the result is less rosy than hoped, and she ends up heading north to Holmgard, where she abandons the world of men for the Valkyries.

So, a nice story nicely told of higher than usual literary quality. There are digs at heroes and their antics along the way, and men as a sex don't get a good book. Is there a point? Not a clearly defined one and perhaps it is all the better for that; the point is the look-n-feel.

Friday, 3 April 2026

Pembroke 2026

PXL_20260406_134018399 With the 4C's to Pembroke for the spring trip. I drove to Ma's on Thursday night; dinner with her and RN. Pix for the trip.

Friday 3rd: drive from Ma's starting early, but it quickly becomes clear there's no need to hurry: the weather isn't great; stop at carious along the way. Walk around Boshersston (GPS) enjoying the quiet and peace, at least in the sheltered bits; we're at the tail-end of storm Dave and it is windy on top. Later in the afternoon to Saddle Head with the others (GPS) for some lightweight stuff. Evening: cook pasta, and to bed fairly early, in the car as an experiment.

Saturday 4th: the car experiment worked well. Quite warm enough, there's room enough to lay out easily, with kit on the other side; only slight downside is not quite enough room to sit up. Today Dave is windy and rain is forecast - though I think didn't happen - to the others decide on the Overhang Climbing Centre in Carmarthen. In a somewhat contrary spirit, I just decide on a nice walk to Lily ponds and windy headlands, just mooching along and enjoying cafes along the way. Slightly disturbed to discover taht Ma Weston's is now a Bistro, and not open at that. Soir: dinner at a pub that Tom found.

Sunday 5th: to Newton head (Saddle head deemed to swell-y) for the morning, then over to Becks Bay / Rusty Slab to meet Keith, where I did my sole VS of the trip when he backed off it. Overall the weather, and partners, meant I didn't get to push myself. Soir: to Mehfil's Tandoori in Pembroke.

Monday 6th: to Giltar Slabs, where we'd been last year. Still good. I failed on the VS right in the left hand (looking in) corner, but only because there was no gear on it, which I wasn't expecting. I'd like to go back again and have another go, possibly abbing down it to see where the gear starts.

And so home, painlessly; back around 11 I think.

Thursday, 2 April 2026

Book review: The Twilight of Briareus

PXL_20260402_150025991 By Richard Cowper, aka John Middleton Murry. I like this one; it is from my childhood. Wiki will tell you about it; and also that there is no star or constellation called Briareus.

The tone is "subtle, lyrical and moving" which is kinda fair I think; there's a sort of eerie tone not dissimilar to some of the faerie parts of Pavane. The story, read through from the start without foreknowledge, mostly works. Here's an enthusiastic Goodreads review with which I largely agree; or this one.

Reading it again but with foreknowledge, and as an adult, the gaps and oddities are more obvious. Quite what the "newcomers" want of us, quite what they are offering that is worth a risk of extinction, really isn't clear. Quite how our bodies have decided to shutdown reproduction, quite how our old brains have recognised something that our new brains have not, ditto. But never mind; one can still glide over these improbabilities. The ending jars; Calvin kills himself for no obvious reason, other than to fulfil some unclearly expressed prophecy; I don't like prophecy.

A consequence of the supernova is a shutdown of the gulf stream, leading to England becoming snowbound. That's a nice part of the story - it gives him a ready isolated environment for his characters - and isn't particularly implausible.

Wednesday, 1 April 2026

Book review: The Neutral Stars

PXL_20260330_121738536By Morgan and Kippax, authors of "Seed of Stars". This one is #3 (SoS was #2) and the theme of Earth-space-colonies-menaced-by-aliens continues, as does the theme of harmful mutation. The book itself is a bit disjointed, and I think doesn't work as well as SoS; to say why requires spoilers, which I'll provide, since the chances of you finding this slim tome, let alone reading it, are negligible. Goodreads isn't impressed.

The action centers around <planet>, which has been colonised and run as a great success by the mighty, and thus inevitably in this sort of book evil or at best amoral <corporation>. A fish biologist, of all people, sent out to investigate, realises that the wonderful harvests of ever-increasing salmon have been accompanied by a strong and - utterly implausibly - unnoticed dimunition in lifespace of the millions of human colonists. How they are supposed to have not noticed is beyond me, never mind, the response is that the <corporation> realises that the <bureaucrats> will order the colony abandoned. So, in order to avoid embarrassment they decide to nuke the colony and wipe out the survivors, and trust that everyone will assume it is the naughty aliens.

Meanwhile, a second plot - which doesn't get resolved in the book - has people looking for a Warp Drive, since the aliens clearly have one. Although why they don't just look for a faster FTL drive I'm not sure, since they already have one FTL drive.

In the end - which is pretty slow of them, I guessed much earlier - everyone guesses that it wasn't the naughty aliens, since last time they just used a <space ray> that turned the entire planet to slag, so why would they descend to nukes this time? And anyway one of the nukes didn't go off, and was labelled "I am a human nuke" as a clue.

In the end - and I give the book some credit, it isn't clear in advance how it was going to end, with the <corporation> evil but triumphant, or destroyed, or what - the <corporation>'s bosses daughter kills the <evil CEO> and life continues much as before. Except for the dead folk, obvs.

Side note: although the mighty Venturer Twelve and friends are nominally there to protect Earth and the colonies, it becomes clear - more in #2 than here, though here by default - that they are actually fuck all use; the only aliens they meet are so powerful that the Earth ships and weapons are useless.

Friday, 27 March 2026

Book review: Tales of Pirx the Pilot

PXL_20260327_151132194 Tales of Pirx the Pilot (Polish: Opowieści o pilocie Pirxie) is a science fiction stories collection by Polish author Stanisław Lem, about a spaceship pilot named Pirx, says wiki.

They are... of a type. Kinda soviet-ish; but also of the naive scifi era. When spaceships were sent out "on patrol" - why would you do that? When space had sectors. And when displays were cathode ray.

They also feel a bit tame. As though Lem wasn't really sure what he was allowed to do with the new medium, and felt obliged to not stray to far from classical ideas. The prose is often of decent quality rather than pulp rubbish, but the ideas perhaps less so.

For example the last one is something of a ghost story, transmogrified: assigned to an old refurbed ship, Pirx discovers the reactor being maintained by an old robot who is revealed to have survived the crash years ago that killed all the previous crew, slowly. For no obvious reason it starts tapping out in morse code transcripts of the crash. This unnerves Pirx who ends up rather thoughtlessly recommending scrapping the robot, thereby removing the unsettling from his life and settling for the known.

This Goodreads review is a little harsh - I would be kinder - but is substantially correct.

New Blue Montane Coat and Rab Trousers

Ellis Brigham in the Lion Yard are having a "refit sale" so I got this coat for half of its std £250; and the trousers for half their std £90. The coat weights 390 g, 110 more than my previous Rab Orange at 280 g. It is a Cetus (not the Lite); arch; officially 395 g but I see I have a "small" (accidentally; it was on a L coathanger and I failed to check. Still, it seems to fit, including over a down jacket).

PXL_20230702_115402184~2 PXL_20260327_152645350 PXL_20230702_115525603~2

What sold me on the coat was the pockets; the orange Rab only has one, and it is high. This means that when walking I can't put my hands in my pockets; or, I have to lift up the coat and put my hands in the pockets of whatever is underneath. Either is annoying, and I readily get cold hands. The new coat is slightly (but only slightly) stiffer material - which I think I only notice because the Rab is so nice and slinky. The "true mountaineering style" is high pockets so the harness doesn't get in the way, but well: I spend more time walking than with harness; and quite often put the coat over the harness anyway.

The new trousers are the same model as the previous, except they are in a women's make, which seems to mean a smaller waist. I think that's OK; for £45 it was worth an experiment. The old trous have a minor hole in one knee, as tends to happen.

Refractive lens replacement surgery

PXL_20260327_104220187 After Scotland, I finally decided that I cared enough to look at laser eye surgery. The problem is rain-on-glasses; on the summit plateau of Ben Nevis, I could barely see anything, and white snow and white cloud makes it hard to see what you can't see. This has obvious implications for safety. After some research-aka-googling, I went to talk to Optical Express, who told me I would get Refractive lens replacement surgery not lasering. This is because... natural lenses tend to start going around sixty or whenever; I forget the exact details doubtless you can find them if you care. Getting tested takes an hour and a half and involves about eight different machines, and ends with what is doubtless intended to be a reassuring video narrated by what looks like a prosperous farmer in a nice three-piece tweed suit, but is actually their CEO. Mostly, they are trying to reassure you that the chances of them miss-slicing up your eyeballs are small.

Lens replacement is more expensive; I was quoted and accepted £9590 for both. Trying to scout around for comparison is tricky, since people are shy about revealing prices. I decided to wing it and not go for two or three quotes.

The promise is that I won't need glasses afterwards. They are a touch vague about exactly how much I won't need them, but I'm reasonably confident they'll do as well as anyone, so I'm just going to suck it and see.

I thought about it for a week and could see no reason not to proceed so I did, booking my appoinment for early-April and handing over my £1k deposit. Naturally there is financing available, but I avoided that. Now I wait, having paid my £8590 balance (actually £8690, because they mistakenly added in a £100 price increase, but they have promised me the £100 back).

2026/3/31: I had my I had my videophone (Teams) chat with my eye surgeon today. All well, he answered my questions (mostly: what is the delay post-op about? Ans: mostly, letting a non-symmetrical lens settle in, so that any shocks won’t cause it to rotate). He did say they weren’t certain of getting my lenses in on time, but we’ll see (geddit?).

Wednesday, 25 March 2026

Book review: Blitzkrieg

PXL_20260325_104756996 By Len "Funeral in Berlin" Deighton. Newly deceased, which was the reason for me ordering and reading this tome. This one is purely historical; but anyone reading his spy novels will have noticed his interest in military history. I think the book gains somewhat by him being an amateur: he doesn't stand on academic ceremony, and has no rivals to knife. Against that there's a certain pop-y feel to some of this. Nowadays, it is nice to just be able to look up various elements, like say the battle of Sedan, if you want more details or a second opinion.

Deighton traces, well, as it says: from the rise of Hitler to the fall of Dunkirk, with the intention of studying the Blitzkrieg, by which he means the rapid German advance. He asserts - quite possibly correctly - that this is the only instance of such; for example, the fall of Poland wasn't. And so it is a uniquiely interesting event to study.

His main conclusion is, I think, that the success was a mixture of, on the German side, luck and rewards-for-preparation-and-daring; and on the Allied side a mixture of bad luck, and failure-due-to-incompetence.

The entire thing is pretty readable, especially the second half about the campaign itself, so if you're interested I recommend just reading it; I'll try to pull out some factoids here.

LD goes through Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland and so on, and from a German point of view these are great successes, driven by Hitler's daring, contempt for the old order, or recklessness, depending on your viewpoint. The campaign against Belgium, Holland and France follows in the same light, so although the tactics were down to the generals, inevitably Hitler gets credit for being bold enough to go with the flow. Likely, any other leadership would not have taken the risk; perhaps better said, likely other leadership would have more correctly assessed the risk and declined it.

But none of this would have worked without the gross incompetence from the Allies; most notably the French. LD points out that they had more tanks, and more aircraft, than the Germans. On the aircraft, there's a little section: why did the Germans have air superiority? Answer, because in the very first attack, airfields were attacked. In response, the French flew planes to safety in dispersed sites, and their comms and org structure was so schlerotic that they didn't bring them back into use.

From WWI, the winners had deduced that defensive warfare was how it was going to go, having won. The losers had concluded that was a really bad way to fight and something better needed to be found. At least in this instance, they turned out to be right. As to going through the Ardennes: "everyone" knew this was impossible, and yet - says LD - in fact some low-ranking Frogs had war-gamed / tested actually doing so, and it worked; naturally this kind of upsetting fact found no favour. It was all like that.

Update: in arrears, I ponder: I think a lot was down to individuals with initiative: not a teachable matter; not something you can write into your battle manuals.


Tuesday, 17 March 2026

Book review: Derai

PXL_20260317_104843170Derai, by E.C. Tubb. #2 in the Dumarest saga, of which Toyman is #3. I love the covers of these editions. See how manly Dumarest is, with his bulging thighs.

The story... well, things happen. They make some kind of sense, perhaps, but not really. Folgone, towards the end, offers some kind of life-extension - if you look at it sideways - but bizarrely rations access to that not by money but by fighting; that's weird, obvs, but also it doesn't make the fighting public, which would be the only point of doing this stuff. Hive makes money by selling its mutated-bee products, which appear also to extend life, but only at the cost of turning you into a bloated incommunicado semi-corpse, so that isn't obviously a win.

The point of all the series is that Earl keeps wandering because he is desperate to find Earth. In this one, he is sort-of offered a kingdom, perhaps even a planet, and he still prefers the search for Earth. This is taken as a given, and is merely the answer whenever he is presented with a choice, but nonetheless it is odd: the book, and the series, never really answers why he cares so much.

Monday, 16 March 2026

Book review: Marune: Alastor 993

PXL_20260228_205046650 A "minor" Vance I think I should say; part of the Alastor "series" whose main element is Trullion: Alastor 2262. This one... is somewhat paler. We have a memory-lost protagonist who in his usual resourceful way discovers himself heir to a principality and acts to secure it; but I find the action and plot thin. Only the traditional Vance language saves it. Goodreads thinks better of it.

Friday, 13 March 2026

Replacement pole tips

PXL_20260313_144819676Somewhere up on Ben Nevis the tip of one of my new poles resides; I think it got pulled out by the mini-snow-basket thingy.

In this modern world of ours I realised I could order a replacement online from Amazon with next day delivery. It turns out that I could get four generic ones for under £5; or I could shell out something like £20 for a genuine replacement part; guess which I went for. I feel a tiny bit sad about it though.

I'll need to glue the new bit into place though.

This is the first time the tip has ever come off a pole. I did consider cannabalising one of my other older poles but I couldn't persuade any of the others to come off or move at all.

Wednesday, 11 March 2026

Book review: Cold Steel

PXL_20260311_105047511 Cold Steel by Kate Elliott is the third in a trilogy, begun by Cold Magic and Cold Fire. I quite liked both of those - though one of them I didn't finish, because some rotter bought the Waterstones copy that I was reading; so it goes. But by the time of Cold Steel something has gone wrong; either my tastes have changed or her abilities have slipped; or she got bored and ran out of ideas to finish this story off. She certainly didn't run out of words though; this brick is 750 pages long and I got through 450 before giving up. Also this review is very late; I put it aside well before Christmas, perhaps in the hope I would wish to come back to it; but no.

The original, if I recall correctly, preserved some sense of mystery; this volume is young female brats being cwuel to their young male lovers; really, sublimated schoolgirl stuff I think.

The characters wander around an alt-Europe to no particular purpose; very little sticks in the mind except a nice scene by a reedy misty cloudy riverbank; but that's not enough to make a book of.

Subsequent to this I read the Witch Roads and liked it albeit with qualifications, so there is hope for her yet.

Friday, 6 March 2026

Book review: Final Days

PXL_20260306_112951513 Final Daze by Gazza Gibbo opens with an eerie claustrophobic exploration of an enigmatic alien structure hundreds of trillions of years in the future. This is by far the best part of the book, and why I started reading it. Alas it is all too soon over and we return you to your regular diet of wham-bam unthinking action in a variety of uninteresting locations.

Incidentally, the "hundreds of trillions" is just candy, really; it is of no great importance, and also they don't say how they know: the only clues appear to be the appearance of the sky, and could you really tell one, ten or a hundred trillion apart? Better books, like Icehenge, have their chronology uncertain and debated and actually matter to the plot.

Aanyway, back to the action: various people wander around - it takes a while to work out which ones we are following - and an important shipment of alien material is lost on Earth, hijacked. Predictably enough it turns out to be deadly and a "plague" of giant structures starts eating the Earth (it seems a bizarre coincidence that just the hijacked shipment is deadly; or perhaps they all are; the book hints at some connection between the disaster and the resurrected man); most of the rest of the excitement is then about Our Hero getting off Earth and shutting down the gates (did I mention that there are wormhole gates that humans have made, and also we've found distant mysterious alien gates that connect to the said far future) before the evil alien stuff infects the colonies, too.

At the end, the bloke who has been reconstructed by alien tech says that no, the alien stuff is actually trying to be helpful, by transporting people forward into the far future where they can live with genuine free will. But our hero destroys the gates anyway, because he has a messiah complex, and the book doesn't try to argue with him.

Aside: given the catastrophe that losing a wormhole would be, and in the book is, wouldn't it be prudent to take two or even three with you?

The book gets some points by knowing enough relativity to realise that, were they possible, wormholes are also time machines (but loses some by not realising that two, back to back, are one by themselves and don't require some FTL communicator). It then gets its knickers dreadfully twisted when it realises that this implies terrible things for free will - the plot is driven by videos-from-the-future showing the destruction to come - and "solves" that by having the aliens having decided to disappear off into the future past the end of the last wormhole, thus regaining free will. At this point, recall William's Principle: no-one ever says anything intelligent about free will.

This (enthusiastic) review reminds me that he also wrote The Thousand Emperors.

Book review: Maker of Universes

PXL_20260301_220040925 Ah PJF, familiar from my childhood; see my review of The Green Odyssey. Unlike that, Maker of Universes is one of his classics, and almost one of the classics, but sadly although the central idea is great, the trappings are not. The Goodreads reviews say this in more detail.

I'll assume you've read that or similar, so know the setup.

The lower, antient-greek-garden tier, is at first glance a paradise: everyone lazes around eating and drinking of the abundance. As things go on it becomes a bit darker, but I think he could, and a better book would, have really gone into the horror of it: people, transmogrified into odd shapes, condemned forever as pets of a now-absent lord, with nothing to do except drink themselves into a stupor as their past life fades away.

Above that, the teutonic and amerind tiers are less interesting; the writing is somewhat bland; and somehow despite the vast canvas he has given himself the situation is rather bland too.

Monday, 2 March 2026

Book review: October the First Is Too Late

PXL_20260302_154646455 October the First Is Too Late is a science fiction novel by astrophysicist Fred Hoyle. It was first published in 1966 says wiki, laconically. There is more to be said but you'll enjoy the book more without this review, so read it first. I guess that's a recommendation. But don't let me get too carried away: whilst it is written by yer Notable Physicist and while it is based on a quasi-respectable idea it is tosh.

The plot: our hero, a composer - and making the hero a composer is cute, and lends nice colour to the book - goes on holiday with a scientist, and mysteriously the scientist goes missing for a bit, before reappearing. Life goes on. Then it is discovered that - somehow, inexplicably, obvs - the sun is acting as a giant transmitter, beaming vast streams of information off somewhere. I don't think anyone ever bothers to try to work out exactly where it is being sent, because as it turns out that doesn't matter, which obviously the characters know in advance. Then, while they're in Hawaii, the world mysteriously fractures into multiple zones, each corresponding to a different time: Hawaii in the "present" of the book's narrative, England the same except a few months off, Europe back in WWI, Greece at the time of Sophocles, Russia in the unimaginably far future where the Earth has been through scouring by an enlarged sun and is now a flat glass plain. The characters talk about the "solar transmitter" and realise the bandwith is what you'd need to xferring the full state-of-the-Earth, and deduce that errm this somehow relates to the splitting. Out hero goes off to visit antient Greece, cue various hilarities, gets into a music competition and is whisked off to another bit - Mexico - where the folks from 6 kyr ahead have ended up. Where his scientist friend mysteriously turns up. Cue much discussion - about the moving spotlight theory of time and so on -  but since none of it made any sense I paid little attention. The end.

The book doesn't even pretend to trouble itself about who might be making the Sun do this stuff, or who may have fractured the Earth, or why; so inevitably as the book ends with none of that explored let alone explained, a sense of disappoinment ensues. The people 6 kyr ahead have, as usual, a mixture of super powers and comedy levels of tech already superseded by mobile phones; such is the fate of all such. Hoyle attempts some naive and rather dreadful politics: after about our time the world goes through cyces of expansion, collapse, the same expansion and so on; until eventually folk realise that having lots of population is really awful - think of all those dreadful plebs, watching those ghastly football matches, my dear it just doesn't bear thinking about - and the world would be better with - let's pluck a random number out of the air - 5 million people. The idea that people, in and of themselves, thinking, might actually be valuable never occurs to him, because naturally he, being a valuable and indeed notable astronomer, is going to be one of the saved. See-also Derek Parfit's Repugnant Conclusion.

Trivia: I mentioned the scientist-going-missing bit, and indeed this occupies a fair slice of the intro. It turns out that he comes back - ta da! - without a birthmark he formerly had. Towards the end, when it gets all science-y, we are told that he came back as a copy, but an imperfect copy. But... why would the vague impersonal copying process choose to make such a mistake? Why not turn him blue, or come back without a spleen, or any of a million other possibilities? If it wanted to send a signal, why not tattoo him with a message? And why did this one guy get a copy / exchange, months before the real action of the rest of the book kicks off? It makes no sense at all, unless our Fred hadn't plotted it all out in advance, had this one bit written, and decided not to remove it at the end even though it had become irrelevant.

Saturday, 28 February 2026

New Friends

PXL_20260222_144919015 E and I were in Fort William with the 4Cs, and on a wettish grey Sunday afternoon after Cowhill, we hit the shops. She got new boots, I got panties, oops no sorry I mean I got new Friends. These are #1 and #2 size, much smaller than my existing lot, but I thought I'd give such a try. At the least, they are lighter than the larger grades.

Cost, £80-90 raw, less with discounts and sale, but still enough to make me pause; but I do need to continue with the cycling of my 30-year-old kit, and I do love new shiny stuff, and this will act to push me into using it. Plus, by next month I'll have forgotten the cost and be up for buying more.

See-also: Old Friends.

Friday, 27 February 2026

Book review: Operation Chaos

PXL_20260227_105141627 More forgettable sci-fantasy pap, this time by Poul "Tau Zero" Anderson, who also wrote "The Enemy Stars". But I only got half way through this one. What finally did it for me was the not the cardboardness of the characters, but their inability to be even vaguely intelligent: for example, when left in the darkness at night, our lead decides without thinking to run as quickly as possibly, inevitably falling over rocks and hurting himself and getting lost. And so on. I think that if you're writing an actual novel, you need to do better at thinking of ways in which your characters don't win immeadiately; this was just too unimaginative.

The storyline itself is sort-of OK in a very meh way, featuring "magic" as actual techology, but done in a fashion I could not like; with no verve or panache, nothing to what Jack Vance might have provided.

I got about half way through before giving up.

Thursday, 26 February 2026

Book review: Journey to the Center

PXL_20260226_161725800 I have vague but fond memories of The Halcyon Drift, but have not read any Brian Stableford for... many decades. The cover of this is not promising, but never mind, I gave it a whirl. I slightly regret doing so; the book itself is not worth reading, as I should have known, except perhaps as a slight foreshadow of Bank's Matter.

The first para of this review is pretty telling. Both for why you might want to read it, but why you actually don't.

The plot - I expound it, because I shall rely on your accepting my recommendation not to bother read this thing - is the familiar lone-explorer type of guy getting pressed into leading a group of people into a situation, in this case a quasi-artifical planet with multiple levels. Since each level is, say, only 100 m thick there are - unlike in Matter - potentially tens of thousands of levels in the interior, and who knows what vast riches of alien relics; we get the usual sort of stuff where loners go off exploring. Weirdly, it is supposed that there may be aliens in the interior who have lost contact with the surface, for some reason when building the world they neglected to lay any cable feeds upwards, never mind.

Aanyway, apart from a bit of wham-bam stuff Our Hero ends up meeting the aliens, sort of, and then comes out again. This is but the first of a trilogy so somewhing more exciting might happen in the next two volumes, but I'm not holding my breath or planning to find out.

Wednesday, 18 February 2026

Scotland, 2026

The 4C's - well, AH - have organised a trip to Scotland again this winter, and it almost feels like a tradition now, harkening back to the days of yore. Following last year's Cairngorms, we're going to Fort William this year. Here, as an aide memoire, is a pic of most of the stuff I'm taking. I'm driving alone in the car so can afford to take whatever I feel like.

PXL_20260218_180057586

So we have:

* (green bag on left): Miranda's boots and raincoat

* (grey bag on top with stripey stuff): misc winter clothes likely not to be used (spoiler: they weren't)

* (black bag rightwards): Daniel's yellow sleeping bag, a bivvi sac, and inners for me and E; I expect to use none of that (and didn't)

* (white bag above that): rock shoes, chalk: since E has invited me bouldering on Thursday night

* (small black bag rightwards): my usual "little black bag" of compass, spare batteries, spare glasses, lip salve, headtorch

* (purple bag): my walking boots, and my old plastic boots, to go with the skis

* (black and white holdall): two new tech axes, two old tech axes, two lightweight axes, two aluminium crampons and one steel, and the new Leopards, E's helmet, two Z-fold poles and two telescopic poles

* (blue bag): std gear bag, which I guess I'll sort on Friday night, or maybe Thursday

* (rope bag): old slinky blue; new slinky orange 60m, new non-slinky blue, my helmet, E's harness (my two are in the gear bag)

* (in front): my old skis with Silvretta 404 bindings (and, not shown: poles). I might get a chance to try them, who knows. And hope to hire some modern bindings for a day, too.

In my big blue rucksac: old green warm waterproof trousers; new black waterproof trousers; raincoat; down jacket; thin yellow spare raincoat; walky-talkies; yellow bag with chargers and cables.

Also to take: car food, and enough pasta to get us through Friday night if we need it; and 4 x 100g fruit+nut bars.

In retrospect: I took too much stuff, though it didn't actually matter much so maybe I didn't. Had I paid more attention to the wx, I could have skipped the skis and old boots; and I could have pre-winnowed the ropes perhaps.

What actually happened

A quick run through; I don't think I need to trouble you with details. Full pix for the trip are here; just mountain ones here.

Thurs: drive up, starting off about 9, a few stops along the way, most notably at Barter Books in Alnwick and a walk along the coast just before Bamburgh. Arrive at Edinburgh before 8, join E and Milo at The Climbing Hangar for a fun hour and a bit of climbing, nice to be on totally new stuff; then back to their flat, sleep overnight on their sofa.

Friday: wander to the National Gallery in the morning, discovering war memorials in the gardens along the way, and look again at the collection. More slowly this time, with several stops for coffee and fish-n-chips for lunch; discovering that the collection is smaller than I'd remembered, but still good. Leave with E about half 3; arrive with no stops around 7. The hostel is actually about 2.5 miles out of Fort William in Glen Nevis; this is fine for us, with a car, but might have been annoying if we'd been on foot. Present: us, Laurent, Andy Buckley, Seb. They make a chilli; I preserve the remains for tomorrow; we discuss what-to-do and decide on walking in from the North Face car park.

Saturday: [GPS] up at 6 as decided, b'fast, I'm ready by 7 but Larent is a little late, never mind, we're ready to start walking at 8. Trundle up, mostly in the dry, it is nominally 2 hours into the CIC hut; we manage 1:45, then have a brief break while L+A, who have places tonight, drop stuff. Andy Halley and Jon are presumed climbing up above somewhere. On the basis of <caution> about avalanche risk - Laurent is far more cautious than me - we're doing Ledge Route not a gully. L+A are a party; E and Seb and I will be another, but I'll be relying on L's route finding. At least from below the line of the route is unclear, but then again the cloud level is on the cliffs. There's no snow at the hut but there is by the time we're getting into the gully. As it turns out the route finding is easy; the route itself is natural, there are some footsteps, and there are a couple of other parties. A good route, but long. Wx is cloud, and some rain, and "warm", so we're all a bit damp by the top. I've stuffed up my gloves game - I need to have a spare dry pair accessible but don't; I should have swapped before going over the top but didn't, I should have dried my glasses ditto - so when we finish we come out of comparitive calm into rather strong winds, sufficient that after a bit we abandon hope of actually going to the summit. For the records, the Ben Nevis forecast was 45 mph; that gets you wind strong enough that facing into it is literally painful. Fortunately L navigated us off happily, with the aid of the OS app. Really I should have tried using the Strava heatmap to do the same, but was sufficiently cold-in-the-hands, and fogged-in-the-glasses, that I just let him do it. After a while, perhaps half an hour, we've come down far enough that we can see a bit, and the wind is less, and things go more easily. Around where we take crampons off we've come to above the lochan, where there's a clear path branching off down, so E and Seb and I take that, trusting there's a path from lochan back to the NF path. And... there is, sort of, rather wet underfoot but not actually boggy; you have to continue quite a long way to get to the bridge below the dam to get over the main river. Looking in arrears I think we would have been better just going up the path behind the hostel, which is actually a good path and not boggy at all, and would have made descent easy. Soir: E and I have reheated chilli - and then she has some pasta too - while Seb gets a pizza.

Sunday: [GPS] Seb decides to go back on the train - he has been up since Thurs - and E and I decide on an easy low level walk prior to her taking the 5 pm train home, since the wx today is no better and we don't fancy another long day in the wet. And so we do the Cowhill circuit, with nice views either back to Ben Nevis - still in cloud - or the loch. This bookended by coffee, and then lunch, in The Old Deli. After, to Nevis Sport then Ellis Brigham to get <stuff> in my case to small - #1 and #2 - friends; in E's case some new mountain boots, since her old ones, although nice, are really wearing out all over. Soir: pasta, and a beer. Oh, impressions of Fort William: a bit of a dump. Sorry. Not helped by a grey wet visit, but the way the A82 runs along the loch front rather ruins the ambience.

Monday: [GPS] all alone I get to decide what to do; Strava heat maps show me Stob Ban and Mullan nan Coirean as a circuit so I give that a go; it turns out well. As expected there's quite a lot of up - SB is 999 m - but I can cope with that and have plenty of spare at the top. Navigating purely by heatmap - because of the clouds - works, and although it is somewhat unnerving to commit myself - because there's descent and re-ascent, so after this point I can't simply walk back easily - it is also exciting. There are also occasional footprints. I'm carrying an axe but don't need it, though I consider getting it out on the final slopes up to SB. From SB it is really a walk around the ridge at the head of the corrie of the Allt a Choire Dheirg. And so back. I've managed my gloves rather better this time. Soir: moved from our 4-bed room to a "dormitory" which had 7 beds I think; but I was the only occupant.

Tuesday: time to go home I think. Wx is not improving. Drive along looking over the loch; stop briefly in Glencoe village but it isn't interesting; consider stopping in Glencoe but cloud halfway down the hills puts me off. Stop at Tyndrum; pass the Kelpies; around Edinburgh; stop for an afternoon walk along the sands on the N side of Bamburgh this time, lovely [GPS]; at Barter Books; and so it is about 7 when I get into Durham so just as well I didn't linger in Glencoe. Find "City Hotel and Bar", which is conveniently central. It was lying about having parking, as I suspected, but the main carpark is nearby and I stop for a pint in The Boathouse on the way back; what I didn't realise is that its windows would be thin and the outside have shouty students and traffic till late; but never mind I sleep.

Wednesday: up early no breakfast wander Durham [GPS]. Highlights the river, and the cathedral. Which is kind-of Hereford like: rather heavy and dark outside, thick Norman columns inside. But with redeeming features of interest. After that, it is four hours drive home.