Book review: Cold Steel

Cold Steel by Kate Elliott is the third in a trilogy, begun by Cold Magic and Cold Fire. I quite liked both of those - though one of them I didn't finish, because some rotter bought the Waterstones copy that I was reading; so it goes. But by the time of Cold Steel something has gone wrong; either my tastes have changed or her abilities have slipped; or she got bored and ran out of ideas to finish this story off. She certainly didn't run out of words though; this brick is 750 pages long and I got through 450 before giving up. Also this review is very late; I put it aside well before Christmas, perhaps in the hope I would wish to come back to it; but no.

The original, if I recall correctly, preserved some sense of mystery; this volume is young female brats being cwuel to their young male lovers; really, sublimated schoolgirl stuff I think.

The characters wander around an alt-Europe to no particular purpose; very little sticks in the mind ecept a nice scene by a reedy misty cloudy riverbank; but that's not enough to make a book of.

Subsequent to this I read the Witch Roads and liked it albeit with qualifications, so there is hope for her yet.

Book review: Final Days

Final Daze by Gazza Gibbo opens with an eerie claustrophobic exploration of an enigmatic alien structure hundreds of trillions of years in the future. This is by far the best part of the book, and why I started reading it. Alas it is all too soon over and we return you to your regular diet of wham-bam unthinking action in a variety of uninteresting locations.

Incidentally, the "hundreds of trillions" is just candy, really; it is of no great importance, and also they don't say how they know: the only clues appear to be the appearance of the sky, and could you really tell one, ten or a hundred trillion apart? Better books, like Icehenge, have their chronology uncertain and debated and actually matter to the plot.

Aanyway, back to the action: various people wander around - it takes a while to work out which ones we are following - and an important shipment of alien material is lost on Earth, hijacked. Predictably enough it turns out to be deadly and a "plague" of giant structures starts eating the Earth (it seems a bizarre coincidence that just the hijacked shipment is deadly; or perhaps they all are; the book hints at some connection between the disaster and the resurrected man); most of the rest of the excitement is then about Our Hero getting off Earth and shutting down the gates (did I mention that there are wormhole gates that humans have made, and also we've found distant mysterious alien gates that connect to the said far future) before the evil alien stuff infects the colonies, too.

At the end, the bloke who has been reconstructed by alien tech says that no, the alien stuff is actually trying to be helpful, by transporting people forward into the far future where they can live with genuine free will. But our hero destroys the gates anyway, because he has a messiah complex, and the book doesn't try to argue with him.

Aside: given the catastrophe that losing a wormhole would be, and in the book is, wouldn't it be prudent to take two or even three with you?

The book gets some points by knowing enough relativity to realise that, were they possible, wormholes are also time machines (but loses some by not realising that two, back to back, are one by themselves and don't require some FTL communicator). It then gets its knickers dreadfully twisted when it realises that this implies terrible things for free will - the plot is driven by videos-from-the-future showing the destruction to come - and "solves" that by having the aliens having decided to disappear off into the future past the end of the last wormhole, thus regaining free will. At this point, recall William's Principle: no-one ever says anything intelligent about free will.

This (enthusiastic) review reminds me that he also wrote The Thousand Emperors.

Book review: Maker of Universes

Ah PJF, familiar from my childhood; see my review of The Green Odyssey. Unlike that, Maker of Universes is one of his classics, and almost one of the classics, but sadly although the central idea is great, the trappings are not. The Goodreads reviews say this in more detail.

I'll assume you've read that or similar, so know the setup.

The lower, antient-greek-garden tier, is at first glance a paradise: everyone lazes around eating and drinking of the abundance. As things go on it becomes a bit darker, but I think he could, and a better book would, have really gone into the horror of it: people, transmogrified into odd shapes, condemned forever as pets of a now-absent lord, with nothing to do except drink themselves into a stupor as their past life fades away.

Above that, the teutonic and amerind tiers are less interesting; the writing is somewhat bland; and somehow despite the vast canvas he has given himself the situation is rather bland too.

Book review: October the First Is Too Late

October the First Is Too Late is a science fiction novel by astrophysicist Fred Hoyle. It was first published in 1966 says wiki, laconically. There is more to be said but you'll enjoy the book more without this review, so read it first. I guess that's a recommendation. But don't let me get too carried away: whilst it is written by yer Notable Physicist and while it is based on a quasi-respectable idea it is tosh.

The plot: our hero, a composer - and making the hero a composer is cute, and lends nice colour to the book - goes on holiday with a scientist, and mysteriously the scientist goes missing for a bit, before reappearing. Life goes on. Then it is discovered that - somehow, inexplicably, obvs - the sun is acting as a giant transmitter, beaming vast streams of information off somewhere. I don't think anyone ever bothers to try to work out exactly where it is being sent, because as it turns out that doesn't matter, which obviously the characters know in advance. Then, while they're in Hawaii, the world mysteriously fractures into multiple zones, each corresponding to a different time: Hawaii in the "present" of the book's narrative, England the same except a few months off, Europe back in WWI, Greece at the time of Sophocles, Russia in the unimaginably far future where the Earth has been through scouring by an enlarged sun and is now a flat glass plain. The characters talk about the "solar transmitter" and realise the bandwith is what you'd need to xferring the full state-of-the-Earth, and deduce that errm this somehow relates to the splitting. Out hero goes off to visit antient Greece, cue various hilarities, gets into a music competition and is whisked off to another bit - Mexico - where the folks from 6 kyr ahead have ended up. Where his scientist friend mysteriously turns up. Cue much discussion - about the moving spotlight theory of time and so on -  but since none of it made any sense I paid little attention. The end.

The book doesn't even pretend to trouble itself about who might be making the Sun do this stuff, or who may have fractured the Earth, or why; so inevitably as the book ends with none of that explored let alone explained, a sense of disappoinment ensues. The people 6 kyr ahead have, as usual, a mixture of super powers and comedy levels of tech already superseded by mobile phones; such is the fate of all such. Hoyle attempts some naive and rather dreadful politics: after about our time the world goes through cyces of expansion, collapse, the same expansion and so on; until eventually folk realise that having lots of population is really awful - think of all those dreadful plebs, watching those ghastly football matches, my dear it just doesn't bear thinking about - and the world would be better with - let's pluck a random number out of the air - 5 million people. The idea that people, in and of themselves, thinking, might actually be valuable never occurs to him, because naturally he, being a valuable and indeed notable astronomer, is going to be one of the saved. See-also Derek Parfit's Repugnant Conclusion.

Trivia: I mentioned the scientist-going-missing bit, and indeed this occupies a fair slice of the intro. It turns out that he comes back - ta da! - without a birthmark he formerly had. Towards the end, when it gets all science-y, we are told that he came back as a copy, but an imperfect copy. But... why would the vague impersonal copying process choose to make such a mistake? Why not turn him blue, or come back without a spleen, or any of a million other possibilities? If it wanted to send a signal, why not tattoo him with a message? And why did this one guy get a copy / exchange, months before the real action of the rest of the book kicks off? It makes no sense at all, unless our Fred hadn't plotted it all out in advance, had this one bit written, and decided not to remove it at the end even though it had become irrelevant.

New Friends

E and I were in Fort William with the 4Cs, and on a wettish grey Sunday afternoon after Cowhill, we hit the shops. She got new boots, I got panties, oops no sorry I mean I got new Friends. These are #1 and #2 size, much smaller than my existing lot, but I thought I'd give such a try. At the least, they are lighter than the larger grades.

Cost, £80-90 raw, less with discounts and sale, but still enough to make me pause; but I do need to continue with the cycling of my 30-year-old kit, and I do love new shiny stuff, and this will act to push me into using it. Plus, by next month I'll have forgotten the cost and be up for buying more.

See-also: Old Friends.

Book review: Operation Chaos

More forgettable sci-fantasy pap, this time by Poul "Tau Zero" Anderson, who also wrote "The Enemy Stars". But I only got half way through this one. What finally did it for me was the not the cardboardness of the characters, but their inability to be even vaguely intelligent: for example, when left in the darkness at night, our lead decides without thinking to run as quickly as possibly, inevitably falling over rocks and hurting himself and getting lost. And so on. I think that if you're writing an actual novel, you need to do better at thinking of ways in which your characters don't win immeadiately; this was just too unimaginative.

The storyline itself is sort-of OK in a very meh way, featuring "magic" as actual techology, but done in a fashion I could not like; with no verve or panache, nothing to what Jack Vance might have provided.

I got about half way through before giving up.

Book review: Journey to the Center

I have vague but fond memories of The Halcyon Drift, but have not read any Brian Stableford for... many decades. The cover of this is not promising, but never mind, I gave it a whirl. I slightly regret doing so; the book itself is not worth reading, as I should have known, except perhaps as a slight foreshadow of Bank's Matter.

The first para of this review is pretty telling. Both for why you might want to read it, but why you actually don't.

The plot - I expound it, because I shall rely on your accepting my recommendation not to bother read this thing - is the familiar lone-explorer type of guy getting pressed into leading a group of people into a situation, in this case a quasi-artifical planet with multiple levels. Since each level is, say, only 100 m thick there are - unlike in Matter - potentially tens of thousands of levels in the interior, and who knows what vast riches of alien relics; we get the usual sort of stuff where loners go off exploring. Weirdly, it is supposed that there may be aliens in the interior who have lost contact with the surface, for some reason when building the world they neglected to lay any cable feeds upwards, never mind.

Aanyway, apart from a bit of wham-bam stuff Our Hero ends up meeting the aliens, sort of, and then comes out again. This is but the first of a trilogy so somewhing more exciting might happen in the next two volumes, but I'm not holding my breath or planning to find out.